0
    0

    Comment on We’re Gonny Need Another Baw. by John Clark.

    Trisidium 22nd December 2018 at 11:09

    '…As long as we persist though, there can be no satisfactory victory for the cheats and the liars.'

    %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

    And may the ghosts of their Christmases past and present turn their festive food to ashes in their mouths, and their  drink to reindeer p..h!

    And let the ghosts of their Christmases to come hold up the mirror of truth to their faces that they might see themselves as the pitiable wretches that they have made of themselves for all time to come in the annals of sport.

    And may the most guilty celebrate in the fullness of time a Christmas or five in HMP Barlinnie after trial and conviction for conspiracy to defraud.

    John Clark Also Commented

    We’re Gonny Need Another Baw.
    StevieBC 23rd February 2019 at 13:51

    '..JC, go on, go on, go on… burn your bus pass and apply!..'

    **************

    Ha-ha!

    You know, it's been a wheen o' years since I saw a job application form, so I might be wholly wrong in considering the SFA's application form wholly out-dated and possibly (at least unconsciously) potentially prejudicial to certain applicants.

    Have a look at it and see if you agree.

    I don't think I'd be too happy to complete such a form.

     


    We’re Gonny Need Another Baw.
    I don't know how long this vacancy ad has been on the SFA website. Has someone quit very recently, or is it a new post?

    "Referee Administration Manager

    Closing Date: Monday 4th March 2019

     

    Job Title         Referee Administration Manager

    Reporting to    Head of Referee Operations"

    https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish-fa/organisation/working-at-the-scottish-fa/vacancies/referee-administration-manager/?rid=1537

    <

    p style=”margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px”> 


    We’re Gonny Need Another Baw.
    Finloch 22nd February 2019 at 08:45

    '….there is an unspoken nod and a wink realisation that the divide has been and is indeed still good for differentiation/polarisation and hence business at both of our two biggest clubs

    ***************

    Not to mention being still good for the SMSM! – which, instead of hounding out all of the financial rogues who brought Rangers of 1872 to ruin ,and ripping apart the rottenness at the heart of Scottish Football governance made manifest first by the UEFA licence scam and then by 5-Way Agreement , bent and continues to bend every effort into propagating untruths and myths.

     

     

     


    Recent Comments by John Clark

    Celtic’s Questions to Answer
    bigboab1916 17th November 2019 at 22:15 

    '…Reading this I would be inclined to think if I purchased shares they would be shares in a club established in 1872, surely this is misleading the public, ..'

    ++++++++++++

    Precisely. 

    And the fact that a query four and a half months ago from a member of the public on the point  has not been replied to kind of suggests, to me at least, that the FCA might have a wee problem.

    If they saw, and see, nothing wrong in their authorisation of the IPO all they have to do is say so, and explain how so to simple minds. 

    Just as the SFA, if they think the award of a UEFA licence to Whyte's 'Rangers' was legitimate, could simply produce the evidence and shut us all up.

    Neither the SFA nor the FCA has taken that course.

    There might be some excuse for the numpties in office as members of the governance bodies of a sport( non-statutory, private companies) 

    There can be no excuses for a body which, charged under statute to ensure that potential investors are not misled by false information given in an IPO prospectus, nevertheless authorises the publication of an untrue and misleading prospectus!

    I speculate that just as the SFA has a problem, so does the FCA.

    Ultimately all due to SDM!

     

     

     

     


    Celtic’s Questions to Answer
    Cluster One 17th November 2019 at 20:31

    '..That got me thinking (I know, i know)
    I have had a look but could only find this.'

    You may be better placed to find the court transcripts better than me.

    ++++++++++

    Thank you, Cluster One. The relevant reference is to

    Green v Rangers International Football Club Plc [2017] ScotCS CSOH_90 (22 June 2017)

    This was the judgment in the Green claim (in 2015) to have his trial expenses paid, that was not published until 2017 because at the time of the original hearing the criminal trial was still not concluded.

    I think it was reading that judgment that must have made me , a long time afterwards, think about looking at the IPO prospectus: at the time, I have to say , I scarcely was able to grasp the arguments about whether Green was or was not the CEO of RIFC plc or only the CEO of SevcoScotland /TRFC Ltd  ( and note how Sevco 5088 is mentioned with no indication of why it  is replaced by SevcoScotland!)

    If nothing else that judgment is a comfort to me in that it is clear that other minds were thinking that the IPO Prospectus may have been misleading to potential investors, and not the feverish  fantasy of some Australian-tanned, sculpted-bodied but geriatric arthritic 'Rangers hating' practitioner of natation.

    The link to the judgment is:

    https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/scot/cases/ScotCS/2017/[2017]CSOH90.html&query=(charles)+AND+(alexander)+AND+(green)

     

     


    Celtic’s Questions to Answer
    Cluster One 17th November 2019 at 17:42

    '..I wonder if they still have this.'

    +++++++++++++++++

    Ha, ha, Cluster One, you can fairly dig out the material!  Your archive material must be worth a small fortune.


    Celtic’s Questions to Answer
    Allyjambo 17th November 2019 at 15:25!..

    '…I'd even open that challenge up to any of the millions of words written by all and sundry about Rangers FC that just might hint, even slightly, to the existence of two Rangers entities prior to the club failing to achieve a CVA in 2012'

    +++++++++++

    Ah but.but..but, Aj, we had the omniscient, omnipotent (but now defunct itself) BBC Trust  AND the Advertising Standards Agency ( like they would know!) telling the BBC and the rest of us that there was a dead club and a continuing entity that was not to be referred to as a new club"-silly, deceitful oul' s. ds and s.desses that they were!

    You are absolutely right : the Big Lie simply must be defeated and the truth proclaimed .

     


    Celtic’s Questions to Answer
    Timtim 17th November 2019 at 13:51

    the signature is of Douglas Odam  the finance Director"..

    +++++++++++++++

    That sent me on an enjoyable trawl through Companies House and sundry other interesting bits and pieces more or less loosely related to "Rangers"

    Not the least interesting item ( in a general knowledge kind of way) is that Murray International Holdings which was dissolved following liquidation on 29 January 2016 was restored [under section 1029 of the Companies Act 2006] to the register by Lord Doherty on 21st February 2017 on the petition of one Samantha Thomson 

    link 2OhBbSqE%2FhZq03gVTz51nTGw%3D%3D&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=84a44313391c8658ce9f2a3d49aea030b5f4834ffacf4999942b93126b88ec92

    [ CH entry  " 21 Mar 2017Order of court – dissolution void"]

    It was dissolved again on 27 March 2018.

    Of interest in understanding how the arch-cheat dumped Rangers of 1872 in the proverbial while looking after himself it's worth having a look ( if you haven't already done so previously- (it was new to me) have a read at

    https://www.insider.co.uk/news/revealed-how-murray-international-holdings-10575967

    It makes my broadly socialist head birl to visualise all the (no-doubt perfectly legal ) multiplication of companies  and interlinked deals and swops.