John Clark 24th January 2016 at 11:00 pm   TSFM is like – The Scottish Football Monitor

John Clark 24th January 2016 at 11:00 pm   TSFM is like …

Comment on Two wrongs and a right by woodstein.

John Clark 24th January 2016 at 11:00 pm
 
TSFM is like a time machine, fist I get thrown back to 1964 when I used to deliver newspapers, then 1974 when I used to process Bonds of Caution  (cayshun).03
 
(Where a deceased had not left a will, and an insurance was required against someone applying for confirmation when they were not entitled to do so and against an executor failing to distribute the estate according to law.)16

woodstein Also Commented

Two wrongs and a right
yourhavingalaugh 25th January 2016 at 1:49 pm
 
Seems like a long time, but not an expert on this.
Some information here
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/taking-action/dealing-with-a-deceased’s-estate-in-scotland
Hope you get a resolution.


Two wrongs and a right
Homunculus 18th January 2016 at 2:30 pm
I do agree with what you are saying, but I also agree with RTC re “confusion” here:-
The never-ending story
“However, there are still many people who seem confused by what this was about. Myths have developed. Confusion reigns over whether Rangers’ conduct of the relevant tax cases is currently considered legal or illegal. Was it was tax avoidance or tax evasion, and so on.”

And even the “experts” here:-
http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/blog-post/taxgate-round-iii-when-does-tax-avoidance-become-tax-evasion
18


Two wrongs and a right
802 Works v Rangers International Football Club
We’ve lost the Sheriff, is there a deputy?
Apologies to Bob
10


Recent Comments by woodstein

To Comply or not to Comply ?
jean7brodie
June 22, 2018 at 17:00
 
Helloooooooo??? Anyone there? 
Probably all glued to the telly.

Something to do with a big cup?
 


To Comply or not to Comply ?
torrejohnbhoy
June 9, 2018 at 21:14
42
1
Rate This
From Rangers Fans Website:
Daviesleftpeg Posted on June 9, 2018Flimflam, Monkeyshines and BoondoggleNews is reaching us today, via a number of sources, on the topic of Club 1872 and the Rangers share offer.
 
 
Looks like you have an exclusive.  Mr Peg has removed his post  (oops.)


To Comply or not to Comply ?
https://rangerstaxcase.wordpress.com/2017/09/
 
11-mur180411 – Copy *
 
If anyone wants to escape current incoming fire, Rangers Tax Case posted the above* last September , so it is not new
(It may be old news to some)  but as a PDF file it can be downloaded and read at any time.
I found it fascinating.
Warning it is LONG!


To Comply or not to Comply ?
JustTheFacts
June 8, 2018 at 22:05  
“All I would ask is for The Lawman to have a good look at the Govt Link I have posted numerous times and give me his honest interpretation of it as an evidently intelligent and polite human bear.”
 
Frustrating isn’t it.
I worked all my life in Insurance and I had similar problems getting people to read the fantastic documents.
One of the risks covered by a Business Combined policy or as a stand alone cover was Loss of Licence (Liquor) So I visited quite a few Clubs (working mens,  golf, bowling etc.
When I asked if they were  incorporated or unincorporated their eyes narrowed.
Why? They invariably asked.
Because this form asks for name on the first line, and if you are incorporated
It will be Auchinshoogle Bowling Club Limited
If you are not it will be the committee and members of the
Auchinshoogle Bowling Club
Then company/club legal differences were explained, and a discussion on the merits of incorporation.
I got wise to this and arranged for a local solicitor to have this typed out, reducing the hassle.


To Comply or not to Comply ?
Vegemite ?

Yeast gives me wind too 07

On that note 21


SSL Certificates