ALLYJAMBOJUNE 18, 2017 at 10:20 I do feel that if we – The Scottish Football Monitor

ALLYJAMBOJUNE 18, 2017 at 10:20 I do feel that if we …

Comment on Time to Make Things Happen by Cluster One.

ALLYJAMBOJUNE 18, 2017 at 10:20
I do feel that if we are being critical of any survival plan that TRFC might appear to be following, that as well as showing how or why it is likely to fail, we must also look at the more positive aspects of how it might just pay off for them. After all, there has to be something that makes them believe their plan might work, no matter how slim the chances of success are. It is still a long shot, though, but long shots sometimes pay off, just not very often.
£20 per bum on seat,
————————–
First time in europe no matter the opposition, i think the ibrox club will be charging more than £20 per bum on seat.Or maybe as a goodwill gesture from the board they will charge £1 for a seat and £20 for a programe.
Now where have i heard that marketing proposal before06     

Cluster One Also Commented

Time to Make Things Happen
JOHN CLARKJUNE 18, 2017 at 00:08  Why cannot I, or anyone else, know who the hell has shares in Celtic, or any other plc?
========================
some interesting reading.
Did the SFA not bring in a rule that clubs had to disclose who were there shareholders. Or was that just  for the ibrox club during the blue pitch holdings,margirita thing.
https://www.channel4.com/news/by/alex-thomson/blogs/potential-conflicts-interest-heart-scottish-football
———————
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13136145.Rangers_investor_aims_to_crack_Blue_Pitch_and_Margarita_mystery/
————–
could be of interest JC.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14523181.Revealed__the_offshore_firms_buying_up_Scottish_football/
————–
     


Time to Make Things Happen
ALLYJAMBOJUNE 17, 2017 at 20:56
TRFC can expect a healthy income from gate receipts and TV money at each stage they reach, assuming no defeated club cries foul on their FFP status!
—————
And assuming no fines handed out for sectarian singing during these matches in europe


Time to Make Things Happen
BROGANROGANTREVINOANDHOGANJUNE 17, 2017 at 15:15       to both tax and football.The original meeting resulted in the resolution being adjourned because we were informed that Celtic PLC had changed their stated position (with which no one agreed) that the resolution was not necessary, as in light of information and argument provided by shareholders Celtic PLC now accepted that there was something very much worth looking into.Throughout the subsequent months and years we have always sought to persuade Celtic that they should be asking questions, seeking answers from the SFA and striving for the truth in relation to the events of 2011/2012. Further, in light of correspondence which we (the shareholders) have forced we have pointed out to Celtic that there are major inconsistencies in the explanations provided by officials over the years and that taken as a whole the “story” doesn’t add up.This is an ongoing position which, at times, has been halted or delayed by legal proceedings over which we have no control.
———————-
This part of your post kind of helps me more with a question i asked the other day.
——-
-meeting adjourned because we were informed that Celtic PLC had changed their stated position.
-resolution was not necessary.
-Celtic PLC now accepted that there was something very much worth looking into.
-sought to persuade Celtic.
-which we (the shareholders) have forced.
—————-
CLUSTER ONEJUNE 16, 2017 at 20:51
AULDHEIDJUNE 16, 2017 at 20:32The Requisitioners drove it from securing an adjournment.so it was handed over to Celtic in Dec 2016 where it lies waiting for court cases to end.—————-So all on the same page at this point in time now i hope,and both parties driving forward.       


Recent Comments by Cluster One

To Comply or not to Comply ?
Thanks again to the court guy’s


To Comply or not to Comply ?
Edit…remember and post article


To Comply or not to Comply ?
It’s quite so a little history lesson for any young ones looking in who would not have seen it back in the day.
This is the kind of headline on this day 2012 that fed the demoted mentality over at ibrox.And the kind of rubbish we have had to put up with for years from the SMSM.
No one voted anyone down,they voted on not letting a newco in.
But the headline pandered to the victim mentality.


To Comply or not to Comply ?
They do or did have some undesirables down ibrox way.I don’t know what attracts them to ibrox since the new club was formed.
Rangers’ Ian Black accused of betting against his own team …
not that betting against your own team is in the same bracket as others,but they do attract them.
An old saying if you lie down with dogs you will get fleas.


To Comply or not to Comply ?
EASYJAMBOJUNE 20, 2018 at 22:24
4
8 Rate This
Cluster One June 20, 2018 at 22:02EASYJAMBOJUNE 20, 2018 at 21:42——————–So the SFA could sanction Mr king=======================Only if he has been deemed to have broken the SFA’s rules.
The only one that I think might be possible would be a disrepute charge, but for what, e.g.
——————–
Acting as a shadow director after he agreed not to.
Not complying with a court order.
Questioning the investigation into old rangers granting of a european licence.(that he was on the board of).
Having a go at the integrity of members of the SPFL and SFA.
Having the new ibrox managment pose in Hummel tracksuits.


SSL Certificates