Comment on One, er, Two Rules to Rule Them All by spikeyheid.
Good article on Bolton's financial difficulties.
It lays out the options before the judge in today's winding up petition. The Peepil will be unimpressed by the explanation of the liquidation option –
"Recovery from this scenario would be along the lines of Glasgow Rangers, in that it would require a brand new club applying for registration to EFL."
Recent Comments by spikeyheid
Accountability via Transparency.
An unexpected development about Rangers Retail Limited
RANGERS RETAIL LIMITED (08142409)
The following information is available from the company's filing history.
8 Jun 2019 DISS16(SOAS) Compulsory strike-off action has been suspended
The previous document indicated that the company would be struck off, but I wonder if some legal action remains outstanding that could not happen if RRL was dissolved
Could this be a consequence of last week's as yet unpublished verdict? Perhaps RRL is to be reactivated if the court has ruled in Ashley's favour.
Does Money Indeed Ruin Football?
Making a claim from the OC administrators may be complicated by the fact that both HMRC and EBT recipients would be claiming for the same unpaid tax. As Homunculus noted the financial returns would be meagre even if the claims were successful. It might clarify whether they satisfied the football creditors rule however. If this was followed by an invocation of NCs 5 way agreement undertaking then things could become very interesting.
Dear Mr Bankier
TRFC ltd have 29 trademarks registered but appear to have no claim on variants of (the) old firm.
I suspect CFC's renewal with TRFC PLC is a purely defensive measure to prevent the newco from exploiting the 'old firm' trademarks
To Comply or not to Comply ?
The TOP legal tussle with King are in his personal capacity, not as a representative of RIFC or TRFC. King has stated there are no implications o the case for ‘Rangers’. Similarly the SD case names King and Murray p as individuals. Would it be reasonable to assume King is therefore meeting his own legal expenses?