ALLYJAMBOAUGUST 24, 2017 at 11:15 20 2  Rate This From the meeting:“When the issue – The Scottish Football Monitor

ALLYJAMBOAUGUST 24, 2017 at 11:15 20 2  Rate This From the meeting:“When the issue …

Comment on On Grounds for Judicial Review by Cluster One.

ALLYJAMBOAUGUST 24, 2017 at 11:15 20 2  Rate This
From the meeting:“When the issue of potential title stripping was discussed, it was revealed that the decision to recognise Newco’s claim to RFC’s titles, was taken by the SFL board including David Longmuir and Jim Ballantyne, when they decided to invite Newco into the SFL 3rd Division.”
————–
In this disscuion was it then asked if the SFL board including David Longmuir and Jim Ballantyne,if they recognise that a new club can claim an old club’s titles why then was the issue of potential title stripping not disscused further? these titles that have been passed on to a new club were still titles that were tainted and won by cheating. some of RFC’s titles were won by cheating just because they were passed on to a new club does not cancel out the fact that some titles are tainted. If newco can lay claim to rfc’s titles they can also lay claim to the cheated titles also.Even if  the SFL board recognise  Newco’s claim to RFC’s titles, they then must recognise some of these titles were won by cheating. You just can’t pass on titles and give them a clean bill of health before you hand them over.
Anyway the SFL board recognise Newco’s claim to RFC’s titles,Why am i even typing piss like that.
excuse the language

Cluster One Also Commented

On Grounds for Judicial Review
UPTHEHOOPSAUGUST 31, 2017 at 20:30
—— That Hearts what are they like, not selling a player undervalue to help make a strong rangers. Club 1872 statement and boycot to follow.
More news to follow….10 Ok i’m trying to get into this deadline day tickertape thing16


On Grounds for Judicial Review
ALLYJAMBOAUGUST 30, 2017 at 15:27  I am sickened by my club’s refusal to sell Jamie Walker to TRFC at a knock down price – by instalments. How dare any football club refuse to sell to the Govan club at whatever price.
————
Hearts have been burned before by an ibrox club when waiting for the final instalment. Why would they accept a sale of a player now to an ibrox club if the payment is in instalments.They may be not as cash strapped now and don’t have to accept a deal from an ibrox club.
————-
Hearts have agreed a cut-price deal with Rangers over the remainder of the transfer fee for Lee Wallace.
The cash-strapped Tynecastle club were due to receive £500,000 this summer as the final payment on his £1.5m move to Ibrox in July 2011.
But BBC Scotland has established that the clubs agreed last week Hearts would receive £400,000 immediately as full and final payment for the defender.
  
The Scottish Football Association insisted Charles Green’s consortium must pay all “oldco” Rangers’ football debts when it transferred the club’s membership to his “newco”.


On Grounds for Judicial Review
ALLYJAMBOAUGUST 31, 2017 at 11:58  the refusal of our clubs to make it clear that TRFC are not ‘Rangers’ will cost them all (with the obvious exeption of Celtic) as young, impressionable players, continue to believe they have the oportunity to sign for that once mighty club. I am sure the likes of Jamie Walker would believe the media’s published view that this ‘Rangers’ ‘return to glory’ is just around the corner, and sees signing for them will take his career to heights unimaginable at Hearts.
——————
Like the Lad Ryan jack.
“Obviously coming to a club like Rangers, it’s always exciting and the European football is a massive appeal. That’s something I’m looking forward to, a European night at Ibrox.
————
He got his wish “A” European night at Ibrox.


Recent Comments by Cluster One

To Comply or not to Comply ?
GUNNERBJULY 15, 2018 at 20:04
3
0 Rate This
CLUSTER ONEJULY 15, 2018 at 19:25____________________
Thanks for the correction CLUSTER ONE, Hummel Park is not part of the Close Bros security and I seem to remember Sport Scotland still have an interest in that facility
—————-
Something i was pondering on when unsure about the security on the hummel training centre from earlier,and your post just reminded me.
Does sports scotland have any say on the naming of the training centre?
If hummel are giving the ibrox club money to rename the centre do sports scotland get a share?


To Comply or not to Comply ?
REDLICHTIEJULY 15, 2018 at 20:06
So…..
(a) DCK/NOAL have a problem getting money out of SA – this was stated in court(b) Rumours of directors seeking to have their loans repaid(c) Rumours of directors resigning(d) A need to repay or extend the Close loan in the coming year(e) Nearly everything is in hock to Close(f) legal action against DCK/RIFC/TRFC is underway on various fronts with uncertain consequences if they go against these folk.
At what point does this translate into a formal recognition by the interested parties (RIFC/TRFC Boards, SFA/SPFL & Campbell Dallas PLUS Close) that “a material uncertainty would exist which may cast doubt over the company’s ability to continue as a going concern…”?
———————
By asking questions like that you have no hope of getting a job on the SMSM16


To Comply or not to Comply ?
TIMTIMJULY 15, 2018 at 19:29
1
0 Rate This
JC  – I believe the same club* scenario only came into play when it was clear the supporters weren’t going to back Green,
—————
Only 250 season tickets sold july 6,2012


To Comply or not to Comply ?
CLUSTER ONEJULY 15, 2018 at 19:25
—–But if i remember there was something about “other securities”
—————–
 the stadium catering outlets the Ibrox public address systems  the bowl TV and the WIFI system 


To Comply or not to Comply ?
GUNNERBJULY 15, 2018 at 15:00

Just wondering about the engine room subsidiary finances. Is it that the directors of RIFC have loaned money to RIFC who have then provided funding to their loss making football operation? Have Close bros loaned directly to TRFC and this is secured on Hummel Park and other bits and pieces owned by TRFC? What happens in the event of TRFC not being able to meet bills as they fall due and the parent company are in no position/unwilling to offer further financial support.
—————
Was looking up the close brothers loan to see if it was secured against no longer murray park,now called Hummel training center or something.
I THINK IT IS ONLY 
RANGERS have lodged details of a finance company’s security over a £3 million funding facility against a car park and a derelict building.
Security documents now lodged with Companies House confirm that both properties have been put up as collateral for the funds which come after the board said they were faced with a multi-million pound shortfall for this season and next season.
—–
But if i remember there was something about “other securities”
Someone with a better memory will keep us right04
—————-
Anyway.
What happens in the event of TRFC not being able to meet bills as they fall due.
————-
Rangers managing director Stewart Robertson had insisted there was no risk of club chairman Dave King and his fellow investors withdrawing their backing.
The board said it had discussed the club’s forecast cash shortfall and reached agreement with Mr King’s New Oasis Asset Ltd company to provide additional loans as necessary.
Dave King and other investors had agreed to extend their exisiting loan facilities to July, next year.
The board said at the time that it was “satisfied that those parties will continue to provide financial support to the company and have satisfied themselves to the validity of the undertakings”.
And directors have acknowledged that without the assurances then “a material uncertainty would exist which may cast doubt over the company’s ability to continue as a going concern…”
The board said that financial support committed before the new credit facitlity was sought “more than covers the projected the shortfall for this season and beyond”.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/16029298.Security_over_Rangers_property_is_lodged_to_secure___3_million_funding/
———————-
Sorry for long post.


SSL Certificates