Comment on Bad Money? by Corrupt official.

    H & EJ. 

        The share percentage sounds really good, but what exactly do they have a share of?. 

        A club that is baw-deep in debt projecting future losses. A club that doesn't own the shirts on its back, and possibly not even the grounds it plays and trains on. A club that is a sweary word amongst kit suppliers and sponsors, and a laughing stock on the markets it was kicked out of. 

        A club so toxic that since its conception, has barely had a court-free week………..And then there is the impending actions ahead, concerning the club it is kidding on to be……………..

        I don't think there are many who would want a share of that. 

    Corrupt official Also Commented

    Bad Money?
    Cluster One 2nd August 2019 at 23:05

          I believe if king was to go down he would take it with him, he has not hung around this long for nothing. 


        I would agree with every word of that and go further, in so much as he would do so without even the slightest nod, to the legality of his actions…….

        On the other side of the coin, I doubt Ashley would bat an eye-lid having him jailed. 

        I was alluding more to the hold he has over the other bears being fractured. A hold that must be wearing thin and the cause of many sleepless nights. 

        Of course I am only speculating, that Ashley would rather have if not more management/control, then at least, "easier", management/ control, over his revenue stream…………He appears to be in, or close to, a position to get it. 

        In no way, are Sevco in a position to receive a "favourable settlement", and even the rampaging hordes must have twigged to that by now. (?????). ……T3B's will most certainly have.

       And yeah……I think big Mick might enjoy the vindication in taking it  back.

        TBH though, Ashley has so many options available to him, it would be a lucky guess to predict……… King?… No so much.


    Bad Money?
    Cluster One 2nd August 2019 at 19:35 

          Following on from my post above, something i came across the other day. https://twitter.com/ClusterOne2/status/1155942708562653186/photo/1 ……………. King has always pushed to get his placemen into ibrox. 


        Good post C1 as it got me thinking. Do you think Uncle Mick would be more amiable to deal with, if his old pal Llambias (or A. N. Other), was given his job back?…. Could a thread-bare bear be tempted do the dirty?. 

         No matter how hopeful I may be, I don't see Ashley cutting off an income stream, and the best avenue to the truth will still be with Res12 and the courts, (when presented to them properly). 

        I do see him(Ashley) in the driving seat, knowing when to submit the bill if he wants the cash, and almost certain Sevco death.,Or, if he wants more clout, when to threaten a Winding Up Order. 

        "A new sherrif in town or deid?", might tempt some, or all, of the concert party to pursue a solo career.

         He would still own the debt of course…….Simply offering time to cough,  on his terms. …..The same as he did with his "Loans".

         The big question is, will having the debt be worth his while, or will he just take the cash?….

         Will this season, once again, be the season of the much loved, and mirthfully missed, "Blue-room musical chairs"?

        Whatever, it's not going to be straight-forward.  A major event, with major reactions. 

        There can really only be one explanation for King's punch-drunk stupidity in decision-making and desperate skelpings…… His desperate battle to maintain control.







    Bad Money?



    Recent Comments by Corrupt official

    In Whose Interests
    Cluster One 6th November 2019 at 22:11 

    Corrupt official 6th November 2019 at 19:57 A discussion also took place about the SFL. Both ND and RM asserted that the SFL’s record keeping was poor and would not provide much for an inquiry.


        Cheers for the memory refresher C1.

    Something just struck me which I must have ducked at the time.

        If SFL records are so poor regarding the secondment of another club's titles onto a new club, that they would be of zero use, then equally, the same applies in reverse.

        There is nothing to say that they did.


    In Whose Interests
    al62 6th November 2019 at 17:21

           I see John James is suggesting a crowdfunded judicial review of Doncaster’s conferring of old Rangers’ titles on the new Ibrox club. Feel sure folks on here will have considered already (?) but worth a punt ?


         I have a vague recollection that it was amply rewarded David Longmuir, (he of the mega dodgy bonus), who bore the responsibility for the new club's claim on the titles of the deid club. 

        I can't quite recall if that was deffo, or rumour.???

    In Whose Interests
    Free the Resolution 12.

    In Whose Interests
    JC &Timtim, re F&P



    In Whose Interests
    Jingso.Jimsie 3rd November 2019 at 11:48

    @ StevieBC & ClusterOne:

    It was a terrible 'miss' by the referee. Inexplicable, in fact. 'Honest mistakes' indeed!


       Around the 12min mark, Celtic had a free just outside the box. I thought I would keep an eye on Boaby….One exaggerated step, when pacing out the wall, was followed by progressively shorter baby steps…..

       It was then I realised he can only count to nine…….Or maybe he just doesn't like ten?. mail

        I understand that, "ten" is a bigger sweery word than, "Wee Craigy", over there, but they do take it too far.