0
    0

    Comment on Accountability via Transparency. by Corrupt official.

        All credit to the Jambos who almost p*ssed on our bonfire. Chapeau. 

    Corrupt official Also Commented

    Accountability via Transparency.
    sannoffymesssoitizz 22nd June 2019 at 18:37

        "In addition to having advised sportspersons on media related issues William has experience of advising on sports contracts (including Formula One) and has experience of contractual disputes in boxing (Calzaghe v Warren) and football, having been instructed on behalf of Glasgow Rangers FC in its long-running dispute with Sports Direct over their commercial relationship. https://elyplace.com/barrister/william-mccormick-qc/

    ——————————————————-

          Funnily enough, subtley pointing out that he offers advice, (which may, or not, be taken) and drops in a few successful outcomes, as back-up…….But ultimately, he still has tae dae wit he's telt …….. crying

    Dead clever these lawyers.  


    Accountability via Transparency.
    Cluster One 21st June 2019 at 18:50

             If the bubble bursts down ibrox way, would Mr King’s slice through his New Oasis Asset Limited company be the main creditor ie. would king have the most to gain if the bubble bursts?

        ———————————————————————————————–

        Most will know better than I, but if the loans are converted to shares, they will not be creditors as nothing is owed….(unless some conditions are attached?) 

       If, and when….Celtic win 9 IAR I imagine the following season when Celtic are attempting 10, that would be the optimum time to put it to the fans to dig deep. ,  


    Accountability via Transparency.
    Cluster One 16th June 2019 at 13:45 

    Corrupt official 16th June 2019 at 12:12 

    If the £3m The Big Liar paid the Fat Friar to buy out the retail deal, was not really to buy out the retail deal, then what was it for then?

    . ………………..

    To bring an end to the charles Green, sevco deal and negotiate a new retail deal that king agreed on but has reneged on ever since it was signed. Ashley has always had then by the shirt and curlies. https://mobile.twitter.com/ClusterOne2/status/1140228099864518657?p=v

    ——————————————————————————–

       Thanks C1

         So £3m to buy out the CG contract…..I assume heavily discounted, due to the "Add-on" proviso that another contract is entered into simultaneously. 

        I suppose we can only guess at the total cost if it were to be entered into, minus the proviso.


    Recent Comments by Corrupt official

    In Whose Interests
    Homunculus 15th October 2019 at 20:46

    *September 19 2019

    Metro Bank has warned it could face a “significant” bill after regulators widened their investigations into a £900 million accounting scandal.

       ————————————————————–

         I wonder if Sevco are in for a percentage of the £900 mill H. 


    In Whose Interests
    Homunculus 13th October 2019 at 12:40 

    Corrupt official 13th October 2019 at 11:4

     It really is a bizarre situation.

       ======================

        It's beyond bizarre H. It is a carte blanche invitation to every spiv, racketeer, and conman that they can do "business". in our country…..So long as they, the rule-makers,  are kept sweet.

          The court verdicts have already proved that law-breaking is not a hindrance to entry, so what is?

          It is a rule demanding to be corrupted by loofah swapping officials and crooks alike, and it has been drafted in a way to make it possible……That is the polar opposite of what a "rule", is supposed to be for. 

        I'm not a fan of uncle Mick, (who is not exactly high on the F&P tables) but if his tank gunners are short of targets and high on ammo, I will happily supply them with coordinates. 

       I cant help but feel that if Ashley was not limited originally to a 10% share uptake, he would have had no need to protect his investment via the onerous retail contracts. and would have been stuck with the more traditional route to profit, via his share-price values……..

        But allowing him a higher share threshold would have made the RRM coup for the brothers, virtually impossible without coughing up loadsa……..Cant have that old boy. !

    . Campbell Ogilvie, and Park D'Bus amongst other individuals, have shown that having shares in multiple clubs can be "overlooked", when required…Just ask Mr Redbull if you don't believe me Companies can do it too. 

         If Ashley was "allowed" a higher percentage for supplying the seed money, he would still have control. He would have no need, or desire,  to screw his own club. Sevco would probably be half decent run and out of danger by now……….Seven years later, they are not !…….

        But they do have the RRM back…..So that's good. mail

         

         

        


    In Whose Interests
    Homunculus 12th October 2019 at 23:39 

    The SFA Handbook

    https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/media/3998/scottish-fa-handbook-18_19.pdf 10.9 In the event that the Board considers that a person is not fit and proper to hold a relevant position within Association Football, the Board shall determine (in its sole discretion) what, if any, actions/consequences will apply in such circumstances.

        ===============================================================

        (my bold Homunculus)  What kind of tin-pot association can "Find", someone to be not fit and proper, to be involved in our game……….and then reserve the tight to do bugger a' about it.

        So much so, that they've made it an effin' rule. 

        An honest association would not seek, or even think up such a clause. 

        Fit and proper?…..Yir in.!   Not fit and proper?….Yir oot. !. ……Black & white.

       There is no need to colour it grey…..At their discretion. 

     


    In Whose Interests
       Is the cold-shouldering a two-way street when it comes to take-overs?……I get that jumping into bed with The Big Liar in the event of a take-over is a huge No-No….Not a wise choice…..But !

        What if it is he himself, Or RIFC PLC, that is the target of a take-over? (either from within or without).

    After all….A take-over is a take-over. Who can align on the side of the leper?

           


    In Whose Interests
    StevieBC 11th October 2019 at 18:31 

              So you've just been informed by the TOP that – effectively – you are so dodgy that you are not allowed to do business with any FCA regulated business like banks, insurance companies etc. anywhere in the UK.

       —————————————————————————–

       It's also brings disrepute down upon the national game Stevie, (although it could be argued that our performance does that by itself). 

       In a real world the cold-shouldering is the business of the SFA. It is the business of every Scottish club…..Sevco are owned by one helluva dodgy geezer…And its official  !!!

       I'm not sure if the SFA will want to go near having their Fit & Proper fiasco coming under scrutiny……..So the disrepute route would be a get out of jail card for them……..But the big liar knows where the bodies are buried……………….Its a tricky wan eh.